Glossary · Invoicing & quotes

SEPA Mandate: what is a direct debit authorisation?

5 min read · Updated on 8 July 2026
Definition A SEPA Mandate is the document by which a debtor authorises a creditor to collect amounts from their bank account and authorises their bank to debit the account. Identified by a Unique Mandate Reference (RUM), it is the essential prerequisite for any SEPA direct debit, one-off or recurring.
The full entry
The essentials in brief
  • SEPA Mandate = dual authorisation: the customer authorises the creditor to collect and their bank to debit.
  • UMR (Unique Mandate Reference): identifier that the creditor assigns to each mandate.
  • ICS (SEPA Creditor Identifier): creditor identifier, obtained via their bank, to be included on each direct debit.
  • Two schemes: SEPA Core (general public, dispute possible within 8 weeks) and SEPA B2B (between professionals, no refund).
  • The mandate must be kept by the creditor and presented to the bank in case of dispute.
I What a SEPA Mandate contains

What a SEPA Mandate contains

The SEPA Mandate formalises the customer’s consent to direct debit. It notably includes:

  • The debtor’s (customer’s) identity and address
  • The IBAN of the account to be debited
  • The creditor’s identity and ICS (SEPA Creditor Identifier)
  • The RUM (Unique Mandate Reference) assigned by the creditor
  • The payment type: recurring (subscription, instalment plan) or one-off
  • The date and signature of the debtor

The RUM is essential: it uniquely identifies the mandate between a specific creditor and debtor. It is included on every direct debit order, allowing the customer’s bank to link the debit to the signed mandate. The ICS identifies the creditor within the banking system; it is obtained from their bank and follows a standardised format (country prefix + key + national identifier).

Without a valid mandate, a direct debit is irregular: the customer can obtain a refund and contest it.

8 weeks
refund deadline on request under SEPA Core (authorised direct debit)
13 months
contestation deadline for an unauthorised direct debit
1 RUM
unique reference per mandate, included on every direct debit
II SEPA Core vs SEPA B2B

SEPA Core vs SEPA B2B

There are two direct debit schemes, hence two types of mandate:

CriterionSEPA CoreSEPA B2B (business-to-business)
DebtorIndividual or businessBusiness only
Disputing an authorised debitPossible within 8 weeksNo (no refund)
Disputing an unauthorised debitUp to 13 months13 months
Mandate validation by debtor’s bankNot requiredRequired (bank records the mandate)
Submission deadlineFlexibleShorter

The B2B scheme is more secure for the creditor: the business debtor waives the right to refund for an authorised debit, and their bank records the mandate before any collection. In return, it is reserved for business-to-business transactions and requires the debtor to take action with their bank.

The Core scheme is easier to set up but exposes the creditor to disputes within 8 weeks, hence the importance of keeping the signed mandate.

III Set up mandates seamlessly

Set up mandates seamlessly

For an SME, the SEPA mandate is key to reliable recurring collections: subscriptions, instalment plans, monthly fees. But collecting paper mandates is cumbersome: signatures to obtain, RUM to generate, IBAN to enter without errors, mandate to archive.

Best practice is to digitise the mandate: the customer provides their IBAN and signs online, the RUM is generated automatically, and the mandate is stored and linked to future debits. This reduces input errors and bank rejections while retaining proof of consent.

Orizen follows this approach with its payment links: the customer authorises the debit online, the mandate and its RUM are retained, and subsequent instalments are collected without further action—useful for turning one-off invoicing into controlled recurring revenue.

What if a tool handled this for you?

Discover the Orizen answer: Orizen payment link, modular and built for French SMEs.

Essai gratuit 14 jours What the Orizen payment link module costs
IV Frequently asked questions

Answers to the questions we get asked most.

How long does a SEPA mandate remain valid?

A recurring direct debit mandate remains valid as long as it is used. However, a mandate that has not been used for any debit for 36 consecutive months expires: a new one must then be established. The debtor can also revoke their mandate at any time by notifying their creditor and bank.

What is the difference between SEPA Core and SEPA B2B?

The SEPA Core scheme is open to everyone, including individuals, and allows the debtor to request a refund for an authorised debit within 8 weeks. The SEPA B2B scheme is reserved for businesses: the debtor waives this refund right, and their bank must record the mandate before any debit, making it more secure for the creditor.

What happens if a debit is made without a mandate?

A debit made without a valid mandate is an unauthorised debit. The customer can obtain a full refund and dispute it for up to 13 months after the debit date. This is why the creditor must always hold and retain a signed mandate, along with its RUM, and be able to present it to the bank in case of dispute.

Back to top ↑